Search SchoolNGR

Monday, 06 April 2026
Register . Login

Choose the option that best explains the information conveyed in the sentence. The ...

Choose the option that best explains the information conveyed in the sentence.

The man reasoned that there ought to be a limit to sycophancy
Take Free Practice Test On 2026 JAMB UTME, Post UTME, WAEC SSCE, GCE, NECO SSCE
  • A There can be no favour beyond a reasonable point
  • B Sycophants need not talk all the time
  • C People should know when not to use flattery
  • D Sycophants should now when to grant people requests
Correct Answer: Option C
Explanation:
sycophancy; using of flattery compliments to gain self-serving favour or advantage from another person.
Option C is correct.
''The man reasoned that there ought to be a limit to sycophancy'' means that, they should be a limit to how people use flattery compliments on people especially when they stand to gain something in return.

Share question on: